Monday, November 1, 2021

"The Masquerade" by Edward Curtin

 

The Masquerade

October 29, 2021

 

“They didn’t act like people and they didn’t act like actors.  It’s hard to explain.”

J.D. Salinger, The Catcher in the Rye, 1951

There’s a reason that Catcher in the Rye, published 70 years ago, has become such an iconic book, praised and condemned in equal measure. It is because it is about lying, phoniness, acting, Hollywood, theater, plagiarism, and at its core, a society of liars.  Actors in a masquerade willing to don masks and face other faces with the veiled glances of the defeated.  It is about the massive social confusion that entered American life in an intense way following World War II, a world of propaganda and performance.  Although the book seems to be directed at adolescents, it is for adults, and while annoying many of them with its adolescent lingo, it cuts to the heart of our current life-the-movie society.  Adults have become kids, and Holden Caulfield knew that they would.  Or were.  Maybe he wanted it.  We now live in a society of costumed children, asking to be tricked.

“If you want to know the truth,” Holden keeps repeating, knowing that most people don’t, since they prefer the Show.

It is also a fall book with echoes of falling leaves in a dying land.  Football and war, Halloween and all souls drifting down in the crepuscular light of late October and the coming November remembrance of Veteran’s Day, once called Armistice Day, when the mad slow action film of WW I, the war to end all wars with millions dead in rat infested trenches, is commemorated, as if anything has changed and such memories are not secret celebrations of the heroic sacrifices the gullible make for their masters.  War is a racket; the ultimate racket.

Liam Clancy reminds us of this truth regarding the “Great” War and all the others that have followed. Millions of deaths brought on by lying government bastards.  Actors in the mass masquerade.

But it goes deeper than lying leaders.  For lying is the leading cause of living death in the USA, and the pharmaceutical companies have no prescription for it.  If they did, and if they cared, which they don’t, they would have manufactured such a drug long ago.   It would have killed them of course, but since their business is profits not suicide, they don their masks of solicitude and bank the spoils, while producing poison to shoot people with.

The great English writer, D. H. Lawrence, warned us long ago to not let the living-dead eat us up.  Yet we are still being devoured by a refusal that knows no name since it is not just them but us – victims and executioners, both in a mutual deadly game.

Death is a big hit, as everyone knows. It fascinates far more than does life.  One glance at the mass media will confirm that.  Fear, death, and disaster are the daily menu, interspersed with kitsch uplift. Propaganda feeds on it.  Up down all around spin that wheel and rattle your brains.

But the ghosts of fall remind us to beware of this necrophilia.  The dead return and wander among us, masked children wandering through the streets looking for handouts.  Adults laughing those tight grim laughs.  How cute!

Nietzsche said that “all things are entangled, ensnared, and enamored.”  I find this especially true during the autumnal season, especially the Halloween weekend of ghosts, death, and masks.  It is enchanting and disturbing if you give it thought.  Its symbolism explains the Covid propaganda and panic more than a thousand factual articles. It explains the warfare state and adults’ refusal to defiantly oppose it.  It explains the nihilistic underpinning of society and children’s fears and wishes to use a magic wand to change the world to one that celebrates life not death. That is the true treat that their unconscious playacting requests.  But the candy the adults give them conceals the poison the adults can’t face.  The poison that they have ingested.

I think of how all persons are, by definition, masked, the word person being derived from the Latin, persona, meaning mask.  Another Latin word, larva, occurs to me, it too meaning mask, ghost, or evil spirit.  The living masks light up for me as I think of ghosts, the dead, all the souls and spirits circulating through our days, swirling like dead leaves in the wind.

While etymology might seem arcane, I think it offers us a portal into our lives, not just personally, but politically and culturally as well. Word usage is at the heart of linguistic mind control, and we are in a world where the minders of the public’s mind have become adept at fashioning language to their devious ends.  Orwell predicted this in Nineteen Eighty-Four with his explanation of Newsspeak:

The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible.  It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought – that is, a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc – should be literally unthinkable, at least as far as thought is dependent on words.

A quick check of the latest dictionary updates will corroborate Orwell’s point about the future dictionary when Newspeak has been fully established, the meaning of words will be so changed that anything can mean anything, even its opposite.

Shakespeare, the ultimate wordsmith, was right, of course, to tell us that “all the world’s a stage,” though I would disagree with the bard that we are “merely” players.  It does often seem that way, but seeming is the essence of the actor’s show and tell.  But who are we behind the masks?  Who is it uttering those words coming through the masks’ mouth holes (the per-sona: Latin, to sound through)?

Halloween.  The children play at scaring and being scared.  Death walks among them and they scream with glee.  The play is on. The grim reaper walks up and down the street. Treats greet them.  The costumes are ingenious; the masks, wild.  It’s all great fun, the candy sweet.  So what’s the trick?  When does the performance end?

As Halloween ends, the saints come marching in followed by all the souls.  The Days of the Dead.  Spirits.  Ghosts walk the streets.  Dead leaves fall.  The dead are everywhere, swirling through the air, drifting.  We are surrounded by them.  We are them.  Until.

Until when?  Perhaps not until we dead awaken and see through the charade of social life and realize the masked performers are not just the deadly politicians and celebrities, not only the professional actors and the corporate media performers, but us.

And while these days of the dead and children’s games can bring us to wonder whether we act like people or actors – “even if it’s hard to explain” – whether behind the double masks we realize we can be genuine actors if we go deep enough, the celebration of Veterans/Armistice/Remembrance Day a few days later should  emphatically remind us of the Masters of War and the need to see through their masks, as Bob Dylan tells us.  The evil performers who “play with my world like it’s your little toy” with their endless lies.

Norman O. Brown so well describes our stage set:

Ancestral voices prophesying war; ancestral spirits in the danse macabre or war dance; Valhalla, ghostly warriors who kill each other and are reborn to fight again.  All warfare is ghostly, every army an exercitus feralis (army of ghosts), every soldier a living corpse.

It seems to me that Albert Camus was right, and that we should aspire to be neither victims nor executioners.  To do so will take a serious reevaluation of the roles we play in the ongoing national tragedy of lie piled upon lie in aggressive wars around the world and in election farces that perpetuate them.  The leading actors we elect are our responsibility.  We produce and maintain them.  They are our mirror images; we are theirs.  It is the danse macabre, a last tango in the land of bad actors, our two-faced show.  This masquerade ball that passes for political reality is infiltrated by the ghosts of all those victims we have murdered around the wide world.  We may choose not to see them, but they are lurking in the shadowy corners.  And they will haunt us until we make amends.

“Do you not know there comes a midnight hour when everyone has to throw off his mask?” warned Kierkegaard.  “Do you believe that life will always let itself be mocked?  Do you think you can slip away a little before midnight in order to avoid this?  Or are you not terrified by it?”

“Whenever I take up a newspaper,” Ibsen added, “I seem to see ghosts gliding between the lines. There must be ghosts all the country over, as thick as the sands of the sea. And then we are, one and all, so pitifully afraid of the light.”

Yet the children and the eloquent voices of the genuine actors I have so liberally quoted here remind us of what is possible if we chase the light and stop the masquerade.  That would be cause for a real holiday celebration.

 

Source: Behind the Curtain

Sunday, October 31, 2021

"(New Normal) Winter is Coming" by CJ Hopkins

(New Normal) Winter is Coming

 

 

Winter is coming … and you know what that means.

That’s right, it’s nearly time once again for the global-capitalist ruling classes to whip the New Normal masses into a state of mindless mass hysteria over an imaginary apocalyptic virus. the same imaginary apocalyptic virus that they have whipped the New Normal masses into a state of mass hysteria over throughout the Winter for the last two years.

They’ve got their work cut out for them this time. Seriously, how much more mass hysterical could the New Normals possibly get at this point?

The vast majority of the Western world has been transformed into a pseudo-medical dystopia in which you have to show your “health-purity papers” to enter a café and get a cup of coffee. People who refuse to get experimentally “vaccinated” against a virus that causes mild-to-moderate symptoms (or, often, no symptoms whatsoever) in about 95% of the infected, and the overall infection fatality rate of which is approximately 0.1% to 0.5%, are being systematically segregated, stripped of their jobs, denied medical treatment, demonized as “a danger to society,” censored, fined, and otherwise persecuted.

If you think I’m overstating the case, look at the front page of this Australian newspaper …

Yes, the Great New Normal Purge is on. “The Unvaccinated” and other infidels and heretics are being hunted by fanatical, hate-drunk mobs, dragged before the New Normal Inquisition, and made examples of all over the world.

Here in New Normal Germany, popular footballer Joshua Kimmich is being publicly drawn and quartered for refusing to submit to being “vaccinated” and profess his faith in the New Normal World Order. In the USA, “the Unvaccinated” stand accused of murdering Colin Powell, an 84-year-old, cancer-ridden war criminal. Australia is planning to imprison people and fine them $90,000 for the “crime” of not wearing a medical-looking mask, or attempted worship at a synagogue, or whatever. In Florida (of all places), fanatical school staff tied a medical-looking mask to the face of a non-verbal Downs-syndrome girl with nylon cord, day after day, for over six weeks, until her father discovered what they were doing. I could go on, but I don’t think I have to. The Internet is brimming with examples of mass-hysterical and sadistic behavior.

And that’s not to mention the mass hysteria rampant among the New Normals themselves … for example, the parents who are lining up to get their children needlessly “vaccinated” and then rushed into the emergency room with “totally manageable myocarditis.”

Image

Still, as mass hysterical as things are, count on GloboCap to go balls out on the mass hysteria for the next five months. The coming Winter is crunch time, folks. They need to cement the New Normal in place, so they can dial down the “apocalyptic pandemic.” If they’re forced to extend it another year … well, not even the most brainwashed New Normals would buy that.

Or … all right, sure, the most brainwashed would, but they represent a small minority. Most New Normals are not fanatical totalitarians. They’re just people looking out for themselves, people who will go along with almost anything to avoid being ostracized and punished. But, believe it or not, there is a limit to the level of absurdity they’re prepared to accept, and the level and duration of relentless stress and cognitive dissonance they are prepared to accept.

Most of them have reached that limit. They have done their part, followed orders, worn the masks, got the “vaccinations,” and are happy to present their “obedience papers” to anyone who demands to see them. Now, they want to go back to “normal.” But they can’t, because … well, because of us.

See, GloboCap can’t let them return to “normal” (i.e., the new totalitarian version of “normal”) until everyone (i.e., everyone who matters) has submitted to being “vaccinated” and is walking around with a scanable certificate of ideological conformity in their smartphones. They would probably even waive the “vaccination” requirement if we would just bend the knee and pledge our allegiance to the WEF, or BlackRock, or Vanguard, or whoever, and carry around a QR code confirming that we believe in “Science,” the “Covidian Creed,” and whatever other ecumenical corporatist dogma.

Seriously, the point of this entire exercise (or at least this phase of this entire exercise) is to radically, irrevocably, transform society into a monolithic corporate campus where everyone has to scan their IDs at every turn of an endless maze of perpetually monitored, eco-friendly, gender-fluid, ideologically uniform, non-smoking, totally meat-free “safe spaces” owned and operated by GloboCap, or one of its agents, subsidiaries, and assigns.

The global-capitalist ruling classes are determined to transform the planet into this fascistic Woke Utopia and enforce unwavering conformity to its valueless values, no matter the cost, and we, “the Unvaccinated,” are standing in their way.

They can’t just round us up and shoot us — this is global capitalism, not Nazism or Stalinism. They need to break us, to break our spirits, to coerce, gaslight, harass, and persecute us until we surrender our autonomy willingly. And they need to do this during the next five months.

Preparations therefor are now in progress.

In the UK, despite a drop in “cases,” and the fact (which the “authorities” have been forced to acknowledge) that the “Vaccinated” can spread the virus just like “the Unvaccinated,” the government is preparing to go to “Plan B” and roll out the social-segregation system that most of Europe has already adopted. In Germany, the “Epidemic Emergency of National Importance” (i.e., the legal pretense for enforcement of the “Corona restrictions”) is due to expire in mid-November (unless they can seriously jack up the “cases,” which seems unlikely at this point), so the authorities are working to revise the “Infektionsschutzgesetz” (the “Infection Protection Act”) to justify maintaining the restrictions indefinitely, despite the absence of an “epidemic,” or an “emergency.”

And so on. I think you get the picture. This Winter is probably going to get a little nutty … or, OK, more than a little nutty. In terms of manufactured mass hysteria, it is probably going to make Russiagate, the War on Populism, the Global War on Terror, the Red Scare, and every other manufactured mass-hysteria campaign you can possibly think of look like an amateur production of Wagner’s Götterdammerung.

In other words, kiss reality (or whatever is left of reality at this point) goodbye. The clock is ticking, and GloboCap knows it. If they expect to pull this Great Reset off, they are going to need to terrorize the New-Normal masses into a state of protracted pants-shitting panic and uncontrollable mindless hatred of “the Unvaccinated,” and anyone challenging their rule. A repeat of the Winters of 2020 and 2021 is not going to cut it. It is going to take more than the now standard repertoire of fake and manipulated statistics, dire projections, photos of “death trucks,” non-overflowing overflowing hospitals, and all the other familiar features of the neo-Goebbelsian propaganda juggernaut we have been subjected to for over 18 months.

They are facing a growing working-class revolt. Millions of people in countries all over the world are protesting in the streets, organizing strikes, walk-outs, “sick-outs,” and mounting other forms of opposition. Despite the corporate media’s Orwellian attempts to blackout any coverage of it, or demonize us all as “far-right extremists,” the New Normals are very aware that this is happening. And the official narrative is finally falling apart. The actual facts are undeniable by anyone with an ounce of integrity, so much so that even major GloboCap propaganda outlets like The Guardian are being forced to grudgingly admit the truth.

No, GloboCap has no choice at this point but to let loose with every weapon in its arsenal — short of full-blown despotism, which it cannot deploy without destroying itself — and hope that we will finally break down, bend the knee, and beg for mercy.

I don’t know exactly what they’ve got in mind, but I am definitely not looking forward to it. I’m already pretty worn out as it is. From what I gather, so are a lot of you. If it helps at all, maybe look at it this way. We don’t have to take the battle to them. All we have to do is not surrender, withstand the coming siege, and make it to April.

Or, if the strikes, sick-outs, and “bad weather” continue, it might not even take that long.

#

CJ Hopkins
October 31, 2021
Photos: (1) The “Sausage War,” 1939; (2) The Courier Mail; (2) Dr. Shane Huntington/Twitter

DISCLAIMER: The preceding essay is entirely the work of our in-house satirist and self-appointed political pundit, CJ Hopkins, and does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Consent Factory, Inc., its staff, or any of its agents, subsidiaries, or assigns. If, for whatever inexplicable reason, you appreciate Mr. Hopkins’ work and would like to support it, please go to his Substack page, or his Patreon page, or send your contribution to his PayPal account, so that maybe he’ll stop coming around our offices trying to hit our staff up for money. Alternatively, you could purchase his satirical dystopian sci-fi novel, Zone 23, or Volume I and II of his Consent Factory Essays, or any of his subversive stage plays, which won some awards in Great Britain and Australia. If you do not appreciate Mr. Hopkins’ work and would like to write him an abusive email, feel free to contact him directly.

Source: Consent Factory, Inc.

"Covid hit the working class hardest, but the traditional Left is deaf to their problems. Enter the populist Left" by Dakotah Lilly

 

Covid hit the working class hardest, but the traditional Left is deaf to their problems. Enter the populist Left

Covid hit the working class hardest, but the traditional Left is deaf to their problems. Enter the populist Left
The ruling class across Europe and in the US would rather see people divided than united against oligarchy, that’s why Left populism coupled with the working-class outlook represents a greater threat to the establishment.

In the aftermath of the recent German Federal election many people were wondering how Die Linke (The Left) had become so relegated to the sidelines as to lose 30 seats and become the smallest party in Germany’s parliament.

Many liberal publications were quick to place blame on Sahra Wagenknecht, one of Die Linke’s most prolific politicians, for the release of her book “The Self Righteous.” In the book, Wagenknecht attacks “lifestyle leftists” for whom being on the Left has become more about labels, identity, and lifestyles rather than the working-class roots that made leftist politics such a threat to the political establishment in the first place. She writes:

Also on rt.com Covid-19 is killing the GHOST WORKERS of Britain that even the working class doesn’t care about

“Left-liberals claim to stand for diversity, cosmopolitanism, modernity, climate action, liberalism, and tolerance. On the other hand, they declare war on everything that left-liberal thinking considers right-wing: nationalism, locking backwards, provincialism, racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia. For left-liberals, faith, nation, and homeland are signs of backwardness.”

This is part of a much larger problem that has been facing the Left for years; far too many on the Left are quick to organize and agitate around anything but the issue that most unites the people  class.

The liberal establishment spent years trying to figure out how politicians like Donald Trump, Marine Le Pen, Nigel Farage, and many other what we might call “right-wing populists” became so popular or won power. In the face of increasing economic inequality, lower or stagnant wages, unemployment, evictions, drug addiction, and so many more social ills, this should be a time for the left to thrive! Unfortunately, it is the right-wing populists who have captured this working-class anger while the Left has failed to seize these opportunities; they no longer have an economic or working-class constituency or analysis.

When the Left focuses on its working-class roots with a healthy injection of populism, it wins. Podemos, the spanish political party, was born out of the 15-M anti-austerity protests in Spain. Podemos utilized a Left populist class analysis and quickly earned over five million votes in the 2015 election.

In the wake of the mass protests over economic conditions, Chavismo and Kirchnerismo gained power for decades in Venezuela and Argentina. The French left-populist  “La France Insoumise” obtained seven million votes in the presidential elections of 2017. At the same time, “left” forces that have disavowed populism and a focus on class analysis have faltered in popular support and influence.

The American Democratic Party is not Left by any stretch of the imagination, but they too have fallen into the identity politics trap. The 2016 election pitted an establishment candidate who called half of her opposition a “basket of deplorables,” against a political outsider who called for an end to foreign wars, and rightfully called out issues affecting American workers such as the opioid crisis and terrible trade deals. Liberals during this time pulled out all the stops to degrade and label everyone who would vote for anybody besides Hillary Clinton as a “sexist, racist, homophobe,” etc.

Meanwhile millions of people are worrying about their job status, their children's futures, their bills, and so many more problems faced by the working class. What answers did the Left offer these people? They would rather lecture Joe and Judy workers about the necessity of understanding xi/xir pronouns than talk about how capitalism keeps all workers down.

If a working-class person wonders whehter increased migration results in lower wages, much of the “left” has nothing to say, besides accusing that person of being xenophobic and racist.

We have seen what happens when the Left refuses to listen to the people and instead offers lectures. When, for instance, the British Labour Party backed a 2nd referendum on Brexit, they were punished at the ballot box. In the aftermath of this betrayal of Brexit voters, former MP George Galloway founded the Workers Party of Britain which argues that “It is not ‘homophobic’ or ‘racist’ for socialists to focus their attention on those contradictions that concern the whole working class in its struggle for socialism.” It is with this attitude that the WPGB has seen a flood of new members and organizers as well as coming quite close to sending Galloway to parliament again.

Covid exposed a lot of things, including showing how out of touch many on the “left” are. With the introduction of lockdowns across the United States, millions of workers and small business owners were scolded and attacked for questioning the lockdowns and for continuing to work.

Those that work at a desk may be able to work remotely, but the same cannot be said for much of the working class. Location data shows that being able to quarantine has been a luxury for a select few; the poor or working class cannot just get food delivered, pay others to take care of family members, or afford to miss so much work.

Also on rt.com US states placing orders to begin vaccinating children, White House says, as regulators poised to approve Pfizer jab for kids 5-11

Large corporations and the rich could afford the lockdowns, but the world's poor couldn’t, with the UN reporting that more people could die from hunger because of lockdown-related economic disruption, than of Covid-19 itself. People who call themselves Left were quick to label anybody who questioned the establishment narrative as a “Covid truther.”

A real Left would have redirected this anger at the profiteers and politicians who failed the workers, giving them only crumbs in the form of stimulus payments. A worker-focused Left would argue for the appropriation of corporate delivery systems like Amazon for basic necessities if they wanted people to stay home, end evictions, protect wages, support those who continued to work, and much more. None of that happened, but at least Mr. Potato Head is now gender neutral. Tell that to the next class reductionist who wants to be protected from eviction!

 

 Source: RT

"The Magic of Rare Earth Elements & the Hypocrisy of Clean Energy" by AKaren Hunt aka KH Mezek


The Magic of Rare Earth Elements & the Hypocrisy of Clean Energy

What is the purpose of the game Monopoly? To drive your opponents into poverty so that you get rich. This is the meaning of success that we all grew up on. 

 https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc912f590-e94a-4b1e-a892-be8d8b9190a4_1400x933.jpegNomads of Mongolia

Mongolia. I’ve always wanted to go there. About seven years ago, I packed what I had into a storage unit (I’ve never been big on material possessions, I’m a serious wanderer) and took off with a small bag, my most important possession being my computer to write on, and began traveling wherever I wanted to go. This didn’t mean staying in resort hotels, it meant going off the beaten track and living in places for periods of time, from a few months in Sucre, Bolivia, Costa Rica and the Sahara Desert, to almost three years in Luxor, Egypt, and many places in-between. I made it back to Phoenix, Arizona from Egypt about six months into the pandemic.

Mongolia could well have been next on my list. But now, with the way things are going, I wonder if I will ever make it. I refuse to be vaccinated with an experimental gene therapy, and the hoops one has to jump through to fly internationally have made travel lose its appeal.

So perhaps the city of Baotou, whose name translated means “place with deer,” will remain of mystery. The nearby Gobi desert calls to me. I love deserts more than anything. Long ago, the region was free of cities, inhabited by nomads. I would like to have seen it back then. With the Industrial Revolution, Baotou became known as “the city of steel.” Now it is known for processing rare earth elements, metals, or minerals, mined in Bayan Obo.

Processing rare earth elements, or REEs, is a deadly and dirty business. In order to extract the ore from the radioactive materials around it, carcinogenic toxins like sulfates, ammonia and hydrochloric acid must be used. It’s hard to even fathom how toxic this process is. Processing one ton of rare earths produces 2,000 tons of toxic waste; Baotou's rare earths enterprises produce 10m tons of wastewater per year.

    

 A worker in the REEs processing plants of China

The villages surrounding Baotou are now desolate, the inhabitants long gone. Where once there was greenery and fields, there are now factories. With the factories came tailing ponds, containing toxic chemicals along with radioactive elements such as thorium, which, if ingested, causes cancers of the pancreas and lungs, and leukemia. Li Guirong secretary general of the local branch of the Communist party, is one of the few who dares to talk about it. It was in 1958, when he was 10, that a state-owned concern, the Baotou Iron and Steel company (Baogang), started producing rare-earth minerals. The lake appeared at that time. “To begin with we didn’t notice the pollution it was causing. How could we have known?”

The soil and groundwater are now saturated with toxic substances. Eventually, Li had to get rid of his sick pigs, the last survivors of a collection of cows, horses, chickens and goats, killed off by the toxins.

 

Lately, I’ve become fascinated with rare earth elements. Like the alchemists of old, their magic is in how something invaluable can be separated and made into something valuable. In ancient times, alchemists dreamed of turning ordinary metals into gold, fit for kings.

Now the kings of our earth have found ways to turn these metals into fabulous riches for themselves, beyond what anyone could imagine. Indeed, they hold the key to the most desired goal of all: space migration. Who knows what richest we could find to exploit out there?

It should be of no surprise that these metals, whose processing is so toxic, need to be known to the general public NOT as pollutants, but as the key to ushering in an era of “clean energy.”

Most of us don’t think much about REEs. But our modern lives would be impossible without them. There are 17 in all, and from cellphones to missile guidance systems, rare-earth metals are an essential component of thousands of consumer products and military weapons.

Like Li, we also say, “How could we have known?” Just as we couldn’t have foreseen how addictive the drugs Big Pharma fed us would become, little did we realize how addictive our technological devices would become, nor did we understand the dark secrets of how they were made.

Let’s look at a few of these magical rare earth elements.

Cobalt is known as the “goblin ore.” Long ago, when German miners fell sick from inhaling toxic fumes while extracting the ores, they blamed it on goblins. Cobalt is used in magnets, high speed motors and even guitar picks.

Niobium is the “tear of the goddess.” It is named after the Greek goddess of tears, Niobe. She was the daughter of the mythical Tantalus, whose name was given to the metal tantalum. These two metals are always found together in nature. The magic of niobium is that when it is added to steel, it creates an incredible strength, far beyond its 0.1% representation of the alloy. Niobium is used in jet engines, superconducting magnets and MRI machines.

Lithium is known as the “prime matter.” It is a soft, silvery white alkali and the lightest and least dense solid element. Lithium is one of three elements formed during the Big Bang. It is said there should be 3 times as much Lithium in the universe than there is and no one knows what happened to the rest of it. Lithium has many uses, such as in aircraft manufacture, batteries, optics and air purification. It is even used in mental health as a treatment for bipolar disorder. Where would we be without it?

Rare earth elements can help build a rocket ship to space or an atomic bomb to destroy the world.

In 1939, Otto Hahn, Lise Meitner, and Fritz Strassmann discovered nuclear fission of uranium, identifying rare earth elements in fission products leading to the invention of the atomic bomb. The United States built an atomic bomb, known as the Manhattan Project, thanks to the expertise of rare earth chemist, Frank Spedding. In the process of purifying the uranium, rare earths needed to be separated and removed. Out of this grew the Ames Laboratory at Iowa State University, now the U.S. government’s premier rare earth elements research facility.

It was fine to pursue this process for specific needs such as atomic bombs. But on a larger scale, separating rare earths from the materials they are embedded in is extremely difficult and costly. Moving production to other countries that had loser controls made these products cheaper for Americans to buy.

And that’s where China comes in.

A Forbes, March 11, 2021 article tells us “While the extraction of these minerals is dispersed across countries, all roads lead to China. The Asian giant has a near-monopoly position in transforming these raw materials into usable products, controlling roughly 80% of the world’s rare earth production capacity, 43% of exports, and nearly 90% of refining. Beyond REEs, China also leads global refining capacity for lithium, cobalt and nickel, accounting for 61%, 72%, and 16% respectively. The People’s Republic only trails Russia in nickel refining capacity, which holds 20% of the world total.

“US nickel production was virtually nonexistent in 2020, accounting for less than 1% of the world total. In fact, the US is 50-100% dependent on imports for 28 of the 35 minerals on the critical minerals list. Although REE deposits have been identified in 19 states, there is only one active mine in the US. Some 95% of America’s REE imports come from China. This is a strategic vulnerability.”

And herein lies one of the great mysteries of REEs. If they are so necessary, why hasn’t the US done more to become energy independent? Instead, it seems we have done the exact opposite.

It was in 1997 that America’s leading rare earths company was sold to an investment consortium consisting of Archibald Coz, Jr (son of the Watergate prosecutor) and two Chinese state-owned metals firms, San Huan New Materials and China National Nonferrous Metals Import and Export Company. Everything moved to China at that point. The only remaining rare earths producer was Molycorp, which owned the Mountain Pass rare earth mine in California. That company bit the dust in 2015, however there have been attempts to revive it, interestingly, partly funded by, yes, you guessed it, a Chinese company.

Trump was the only United States president since Nixon to achieve what every president had promised: energy independence. Under Trump, the U.S. relied less on foreign energy than any other time since 1991. As a businessman not a politician, Trump recognized that we didn’t need more talks and photo ops with world leaders making promises they had no intention of keeping. We needed to get out of the way of companies and let them do what they do best: produce.

In contrast, the Biden administration is doing the opposite. For example, even as he has cut oil production at home, he has called for oil-producing countries to "do more." In his withdrawal from Afghanistan, disastrous on so many levels, Biden abandoned untapped reserves of rare-earth metals in Taliban hands. Yes, rare earth metals are notoriously difficult to extract, however, during all those years in Afghanistan it is interesting that no attempt ever got off the ground to mine these metals. It will be further interesting to see what China does with this new opportunity.

We all understand the need to reduce use of fossil fuels. But in reducing them, all we have done is shift to other energy needs that promise to far outstrip our cravings for oil and natural gas, and with potentially worse consequences for the planet. Furthermore, when making such a shift, surely our government shouldn’t kill the economy of its own people while boosting the economies of those it claims are our enemies?

Kathleen Sgamma, president of the Colorado-based Western Energy Alliance, states, “I’ve actually never seen an energy issue crystalize so clearly in the American mind, as people are feeling the squeeze of high energy prices and looking on with disbelief as this president favors OPEC+ over American producers,”

Demand for REEs is currently outstripping supply by about 3,000 tons per year according to Julie Klinger, the author of "Rare Earth Frontiers." The US needs 10X more rare earth metals to hit Biden’s Electric Vehicle goals. As for defense, if you just take an ordinary F-35 fighter, it contains nearly 1,000 pounds of rare earths. Every cell phone and every Electric Vehicle motor needs powerful permanent magnets made from REEs.

Unlike the West, China has never had a problem with polluting its own land or exploiting its own people. In the West, our leaders have had to give the appearance of caring about the planet. For Americans, we’ve been molded into thinking that appearance is everything. And so, just as we feigned horror over the morality of gain of function research, allowing China to do the dirty work for us while continuing to fund it, we have done the same with REEs.

The greed and hypocrisy of our leaders has only seemed to grow exponentially with the necessity to hide it—something that has proved increasingly difficult to do with the advent of the internet. Along with hiding the truth about COVID, the need to hide the truth about clean energy has meant that the internet is now being regulated and access to information beyond the State sanctioned narrative is increasingly hard to find.

There is a brilliant new series out called Comrade Detective. The episodes are presented as a fictional lost 1980s era Romanian television show, commissioned by the Communist Party as propaganda against the evils of capitalism. 

 

 Comrade Detective. Gregor is on the left and Iosef is on our right. The woman in the middle is the United States Ambassador to Romania, who is secretly appalled at the evil excess of the United States and is in love with Gregor.

 

Two detectives, Gregor and Iosef, are the heroes of the show and they spend all their time fighting capitalist corruption and greed in the form of gangsters who smuggle products into Romania such as jeans, drugs and soda.

An hilarious scene involves the game of Monopoly. The two detectives find the game hidden in the lining of a car seat and can’t figure out what it is. Gregor says he knows two people who can help them, but he warns Iosif to watch out as they are crafty and dangerous. Gregor and Iosif travel in their decrepit little car to a prison outside of town. There they interrogate a dejected older couple who’ve been imprisoned for betraying their country after falling under the temptations of capitalism.

When Gregor asks them about Monopoly, this is what happens:

Male prisoner: The object of the game is to purchase property and hope that your opponent lands on the property that you own.

Gregor (confused): Why?

Female prisoner: That way they pay you rent. The more rent you get paid, the more money you make, the more properties you purchase.

Male prisoner: And when your opponents have no money left and are completely in your debt, then, and only then, do you win the game.

Iosif (shocked and disgusted): You’re telling me that the purpose of this game is to drive your fellow citizens into poverty so that you may get rich?

Female prisoner laughs.

Iosif: That’s diabolical!

Female prisoner shrugs: It’s just a game.

Male prisoner: Nowadays the West finds it a useful tool to indoctrinate young children into the capitalist system.

Gregor and Iosif leave the prison in subdued silence. Iosif can tell something is bothering Gregor. He asks Gregor how he knew about the two criminals. Gregor confesses with loathing that they are his own parents. He is the one who turned them in.

Iosif nods in understanding and tells Gregor he did the right thing.

The scene is funny, but it’s also disconcerting. I’d played Monopoly a hundred times as a kid but had never looked at it like that. How about the game Risk? I’d been very good at killing off everyone else and taking over the world. What if these games had really been a sinister plot to indoctrinate youth and turn them into evil capitalists? Because, looked at from this perspective, capitalism surely is diabolical, just as Iosif says.

Even more diabolical, what if the ultimate purpose had been to make children accept that only a few succeed at the expense of everyone else because that’s the meaning of success?

Maybe people will find my saying this about capitalism offensive, but in the end, how is the ultimate result of capitalism any different from the ultimate result of communism? Or fascism? Or any political ideology ever, for that matter? 

 

 The bad guy in Comrade Detective goes around killing people wearing a Reagan mask.

 

On Sunday, October 31st, the 26th UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26) will begin in Glasgow, Scotland. It will last 12 days and promises to be the largest gathering of world leaders ever to take place on British soil. I can assure you, the conference is all for show. It is behind the scenes that the important deals are made. And many of them are about REEs.

Conspicuously missing will be Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. But really, why should they attend? What do they have to gain by parading about for the sake of a few media photo ops? Unlike Western leaders, they don’t play those self-righteous games.

Western world leaders are still convinced that if they at least appear to be clean energy warriors, people will believe them.

Just a few nights ago, some of the cream of the crop dined with Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Among them were Bill Gates; Goldman Sachs boss, David Solomon; JP Morgan chief executive, Jamie Dimon; Jes Staley, head of Barclays; Larry Fink, boss of the investment firm BlackRock; Stephen Schwarzman, the chief executive of the private equity firm Blackstone.

These are the men who quietly run the world. The pandemic has been good to them. Bezos and Musk weren’t at that dinner but they will be at COP26. In their cozy little competition to rule the world, Musk just sent Bezos a silver medal emoji on Twitter, now that Musk, as the richest man on the planet, is worth almost $30 billion more than Bezos.

Musk successfully sold the story that his electric vehicles are “clean” energy because they are run with a lithium-ion rechargeable batteries instead of dirty oil. This is a complete and utter lie. There is nothing clean about lithium. Oh, but it will be in the future.

Elon Musk’s electric vehicles use from 100-150% more of these vital metals and REEs than cars with internal combustion engines. He tweeted in February that “nickel is our biggest concern for scaling lithium-ion cell production," adding that nickel production in the US is "objectively very lame."

US nickel production was virtually nonexistent in 2020, accounting for less than 1% of the world total. Research firm Wood Mackenzie estimated that demand for the mineral will increase by 64 percent between 2019 and 2025. It could even be more now. Canada Nickel Company claims it can extract the metal almost carbon free, but that remains to be seen. How much will that cost?

It will take years for the United States to catch up with China in processing of REES, if it ever does. Processing facilities cost hundreds of millions of dollars each.

In the meantime, where have all these leaders who claim to care about the environment been getting their EERs?

Mostly from China, of course!

While small business owners saw their doors closing and families were unable to pay their mortgages and rents, the top 1 % saw their wealth grow to 16 % greater than the bottom 50 %—not because they cared about the planet but because they exploited it. As a result, the wealthiest 10% of Americans own about 89% of stocks and mutual funds held in the U.S. as of the first quarter of 2021, according to Fed data. The bottom 50% of U.S. households hold around 0.5%.

And just watch. As they ramp up production of the REEs they crave, the common people will need to subsist on less and less, all the while being blamed for any disastrous effects incurred upon the planet.

The “National Intelligence Estimate” on climate warns how “a changing climate could upend societies and topple governments,” and how we need to “inoculate the public against misinformation on climate change.”

Interesting the choices of the words inoculate and misinformation.

If there’s anything we are supposed to have learned during the course of this pandemic it’s that nothing makes you safer than an inoculation!

And it wouldn’t be surprising if spreading misinformation soon became a crime, punishable by prison.

And rightly so!

There have been so many dangerous conspiracy theories floating about lately. Luckily, we have expert fact checkers to shut them down—like that absurd idea that the NIH was funding gain of function research in China.

But climate change, now that’s real, and honestly, I’m not saying it isn’t. But just like the lying State experts on COVID, we cannot trust the “data” or the “science” on climate change, we would be fools to do so.

We have all heard the ominous predictions of rising sea levels, shrinking mountain glaciers, accelerating ice melts in Greenland, Antarctica and the Arctic, resulting in mass migrations, unrest, famine and drought if we don’t do something about it.

Never fear. The elite are coming to the rescue—when have they ever let us down before? Watch in amazement as they arrive at COP26 in their private jets, having left their massive mansions in the care of housekeepers and security guards.

Besides those in the highest echelons of power, up to 25,000 government representatives, media and campaigners from around the world will be scurrying about at the convention, wheeling and dealing.

It’s no surprise, given the importance of this conference, that the pandemic has promised to stay away. Unlike the rest of us who find our freedoms increasingly dependent on whether or not we’ve submitted to an experimental gene therapy injected into our bodies, the attendees of the CPO26 will not be required to be fully vaccinated.

Yes, you heard that right.

Remember, this is a pandemic. Only yesterday, an old friend of mine who no longer talks to me, posted on Facebook how her own son suffered from tinnitus and severe fatigue after receiving the vaccine. But that’s better than dying, right?

Yes, she said that.

If we don’t get the shot we will die. Many believe this. Even as the elite travel quite happily without such restrictions. It is really quite incredible how well they have succeeded in their propaganda campaign.

I don’t recall reading about the elite holding parties during the Bubonic Plague. Once they realized how dangerous it was, they wasted no time in scurrying off to their country estates where they locked themselves down until everyone outside of the gates who was going to die did. Only then, did they reappear.

Obviously, the overlords have gained some kind of superhero powers since the 1300s, where the illnesses that kill the rest of us don’t affect them at all.

Thankfully so, since they have such important work to do, all to protect the rest of us.

The goal of the climate czars is to keep the earth’s temperature from rising above 1.5 degrees Celsius or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit. If we don’t do this, we will be living under water, or maybe there will be no water at all. Or it will all be polluted. The air will be unbreathable. Earth will become a desolate wasteland.

Whatever. It will all be bad.

Where Trump called out the hypocrisy of the climate hysteria and withdrew from the Paris Climate Accord, Biden has eagerly joined again, offering up the United States as an example of self-sacrifice. Biden has pledged the United States will cut greenhouse emissions in half by 2030 and will reach 0 emissions by 2050.

China’s leaders are chuckling and rubbing their hands together in glee. China obviously understood something the rest of the world didn’t. As far back as 1992, Deng Xiaoping stressed that “the Middle East has oil; China has rare earths.”

While COP26 will be for show, the biggest deals are the ones we rarely ever hear about. What is the ultimate goal? Something I’ve talked about through other lenses in previous essays: The wide open expanse of Space and the riches it surely holds. Because, just as all roads lead to China when it comes to REEs, all roads lead to space when it comes to the ultimate use of those REEs. And to get there, the overlords must perpetuate the lie that they will replace dirty energy with clean energy.

As we have seen, up until the very moment I am writing these words, calling the mining of REEs “clean” energy has been a lie. What reason do we have to think, based on everything we know from history, that this reality will change in the future?

During Trump’s reign, he signed an executive order to support moon mining and to tap asteroid resources. This added on to a 2015 federal law allowing American companies and citizens to mine moon and asteroid resources but stressed that there would not be a need to get bogged down with international treaties to do so. In other words, neither the Moon nor asteroids would be viewed as “global commons.”

Meaning that, just like your very DNA can now be owned by Bill Gates and Big Pharma, the moon and other locations can be owned by whoever gets there first and plants their flag. Our overlords fully intend to exploit everything they can here on earth so that they can then exploit what they find in space. Elon Musk has said his first task will be to beam down ads from space. Just think how rich he can get doing that?

The sky above us will be owned. No more gazing at the mystery of the twinkling stars. No kissing under the light of the moon. No more magic at all.

Hmm, I wonder what the Chinese have to say about that? Or the Russians? Judging by the wars we have engaged in on earth, just imagine the wars over ownership in space. Star Wars will pale in comparison.

If there are aliens out there, no wonder they are monitoring us. Clearly they are more advanced than we are and I can’t see them being any too happy about such a violent race making its way beyond planet Earth.

I watched with some fascination as William Shatner came back after being shot into space by Bezos’s penis-shaped rocket. He hugged a rather stiff Bezos and thanked him. “What you’ve given me is the most profound experience I can imagine,” he said. Adding that it was “unbelievable” and something “everyone in the world needs to do.”

I grew up watching Captain Kirk explore “space, the final frontier” in the Star Ship Enterprise. The crew had all kinds of adventures I’d love to have, encountering aliens both good and evil, traveling at warp speed, and shooting lazar guns. Now, here was the real man, William Shatner, being shot a mere 65 miles into the air and realizing the profundity of even that small distance.

Out there was death. While looking back at Earth, he saw Life.

Shatner was teary-eyed in his thanks, only to have Bezos bring us all back to harsh reality by popping open a champagne bottle and interrupting Shatner with the jarring words, “Here, you want a little of this?” An offer Shatner declined.

This is of no surprise. To Bezos, Shatner’s trip to the edge of space wasn’t some spiritual awakening. It was a golden media moment, calculated to bring him more success. The success Comrade Detective talks about.

But now, the strangest thing of all. We’ve been told by our own government that there could likely be aliens out there. Apparently, just as they lied to us for our own good about COVID, they’ve been lying to us about aliens and UFOs for all these years. Those who claimed to have seen them were called, yes, you guessed it, conspiracy theorists.

Why are they letting that information out now? I do not have the answer to that question. But I have no doubt we will find out and it will be interesting to see another drama unfold.

Years ago, the revelation that UFOs are real would have been greeted as the biggest story of all time. But now? People are so bogged down with worries of catching COVID from the unvaccinated, being evicted from their homes, rising gas and food prices, backlogs of supplies at sea ports, and on and on, who cares about aliens being out there and possibly invading our planet?

Whatever they turn out to be, evil or good, if in fact they are real at all and not just another story made up to manipulate us, they certainly must be shaking their heads in perplexity. Just one look at our highways and the horrific crashes must have them wondering how we faithfully get into our death machines every day with the odds of 1 in 103 dying, while simultaneously cowering in our homes over fear of a virus with a 99.9% survival rate.

Observing Bezos’s rocket shoot into the atmosphere must have looked to the aliens like a group of ants climbing onto a blade of grass and claiming they were exploring the entire world when all they were doing was exploring a tiny section of someone’s backyard.

It might be a good idea to clean up that backyard first—truly clean it up—before we ventured into space. Somehow, I feel the overlords out there won’t go for us expanding our mess beyond our own planet.

Is there still a chance I can make it to Mongolia one day? I certainly hope so!

 

Source: Break Free with Karen Hunt

"Panopticon: How Mainstream Academia Normalized Mass Imprisonment" by Joaquin Flores

 Panopticon: How Mainstream Academia Normalized Mass Imprisonment

The panopticon of the Smart City is a system set up so that free citizens police, interrogate, and report on each other.

Academia, with its woke newspeak, is a god-awful thing. Only through the complete destruction of language can actually fascist policies, which threaten to eradicate humanity, be passed off as progressive, even social-democratic. Our aim is to build upon our previous chapters to show that these were not intellectual fishing expeditions – we’re here with the receipts.

Jeremy Bentham’s horrific theory and model of the Panopticon is openly presented as a ‘positive vision of the future’ which official academia endorses through its ivory-tower liberal idealists as the foundation of ‘Smart Cities’. The Great Reset openly takes its inspiration for the ‘Smart City’ from the Panopticon prison system.

In his 1975 work, ‘Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison’, the French poststructuralist Michel Foucault, combining the ideas of his Marxist mentor Althusser and those of Nietzsche, looks at Bentham’s panopticon and traces it back in time to the concept of the quarantine justified by a plague. He goes on to describe the 17th century city under quarantine as the basis of our modern conception of prison in horrifically prescient detail, given the present reality of a plague-justified lockdown, citizen tracking, and control system already imprisoning millions of people in Europe and the Anglophone world.

Is this a mere coincidence? Or have the planners of the Great Reset intentionally taken Foucault’s critical description of the plague-to-panopticon as their operating system?

Michel Foucault (left), Jeremy Bentham (right)

The prison grid society, the Panopticist project was developed by the 19th century English liberal Jeremy Bentham, as we discussed in ‘Smart Cities: The Perfection of the Prison Grid Society’.

Smart Cities are not merely poor or distorted manifestations of a genuinely positive vision, they are genealogically defective, going back to that great enemy of humanity, Thomas Hobbes, whose influence on Bentham was profound.

From the perspective of planned development, these new cities are the culmination of several decades of ‘green’ initiatives at the heart of public-private synergy initiatives, which has been the meal ticket for any number of universities.

Academia in Service of Technocracy

Because of the corporatized decline of western civilization, including at the level of the academy, there has been a compartmentalization and lack of a truly critical interdisciplinary approach. This has left the schools of law, engineering, and technology the task of proposing neo-Benthamian panopticons as Smart Cities, and openly so, but with a shockingly impoverished understanding of political science and political philosophy. You see, in their minds, these things are good.

And yet these fields necessarily inform both the ethical and practical dimensions of any such civilizational project such as a ‘Great Reset’ to ‘build back better’ into ‘Smart Cities’.

None of which is to say that there isn’t some attempt to grapple with the ethics of the endeavor at the academic level. The point here is that the state of the academy has been so far impoverished, precisely as the result of the awards for faculty and chairs system has been driven by philanthropy – a philanthropy which in turn serves the interests of the technocracy, in line with the World Economic Forum’s projects like its ‘Partners Program’, which works in tandem with its ‘Young Global Leaders’ initiative.

This creates an echo chamber and vicious cycle, where chairs of departments with powers over curriculum and emphasis of the departments in question, then promote the next generation of candidates through their post-secondary programs, who in turn advance through a ‘merit’ program of awards on the basis of embodying the vision already laid out by the WEF. It’s a gift that keeps on giving.

If we conceive of ‘social democracy’ as the economics of fascism with its twin system of corporate dominance plus a welfare state, add to it the recent emergence of an official ‘in-group vs. out-group’ two-citizen class system, take away meaningful elections, then we can see a parallel construction or analogous evolution of para-fascist technocracy emerging from various fields of ‘expertise’. All without the fachidiots in each field having a view of the entire leviathan.

The work of Foucault and his influence on ‘Smart Cities’ is not merely an abstraction we insist upon, but rests firmly and openly in the peer-review and academic literature on the construction of Smart Cities. We do not claim that Foucault advocated such, as his analysis is non-advocacy. But the institution he labored in had a reason for his retention.

For context, we will first cite the relevant section of the text from the above referenced ‘Discipline & Punish’.

“This enclosed, segmented space, observed at every point, in which the individuals are inserted in a fixed place, in which the slightest movements are supervised, in which all events are recorded, in which an uninterrupted work of writing links the centre and the periphery, in which power is exercised without division, according to a continuous hierarchical figure, in which each individual is constantly located, examined and distributed among the living beings, the sick and the dead – all this constitutes a compact model of the disciplinary mechanism.[…]

But there was also the political dream of the plague, […] The plague-stricken town, traversed throughout by hierarchy, surveillance, observation, writing; the town immobilized by the functioning of an extensive power that bears in a distinct way over all individual bodies – this is the utopia of the perfectly governed city. The plague (envisaged as a possibility at least) is the trial in the course of which one may define ideally the exercise of disciplinary power. In order to make rights and laws function, according to pure theory, the jurists place themselves in imagination in the state of nature; in order to see perfect disciplines functioning, rulers dreamt of the state of the plague.” – (Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, chapter ‘Panopticism’ pp. 197-198)

Those who are aware, who have enough of an interdisciplinary foundation to see what is truly developing, find themselves as either renegades of that system, or as its minions and ideologues, whose own motivations border on irrelevant given that the system will always tend to produce the parts which it requires.

A typical example of these minions can be found at the Queensland Institute of Technology, Faculty of Law. Emerging from corporate ‘synergy’ law studies in the arenas of intellectual property, ecological concerns, international law, and the development of ‘Smart Cities’ we find the Datafication and Automation of Human Life Research Program.

The entire project is framed just like the ‘criticism’ of the IMF which comes from the WEF. Their masthead art reflects that: it is a person imprisoned, and here we are to assume that they are against such a system. If polled, how many would affirm that they are opposed to illiberal solutions, and instead support a discourse of empowerment? Yet the meaning and substance of their work is entirely corporatist and technocratic, demeaning human beings and changing laws from minimum requirements to maximum demands of the technocracy.

For example, the work of Lachlan Robb and Felicity Deane of the DAHL program, in “Smart Cities as Panopticon: Highlighting Blockchain’s Potential for Smart Cities Through Competing Narratives”, we find a microcosm of the inverted world, where technocracy is disguised in the language of progressive newspeak, evidenced in the abstract alone:

“This chapter argues that the narratives of smart cities demonstrate the potential value of blockchain technologies. Drawing upon competing narratives within the cultural imaginary, both the ‘dream’ of a better city, and the ‘fear’ of an oppressive structure will highlight the need to consider both Bentham and Foucault’s Panopticon. The term ‘panopticon’ is defined and explored within the context of blockchain technology. In doing so three concepts are identified: the enabling nature of a panopticon; the use of a blockchain-enabled-panopticon to encourage human flourishing; and the ability for technology such as this to enhance standards above a basic minimum of the law. This chapter suggests that understanding smart cities, panopticon and blockchain, may allow for a better account for competing narratives of fear that can lead to a deeper understanding of how this technology can be deployed.”

What is being proposed here is identical to what we have consistently warned about in pieces such as ‘Deplorable Until Proven Compliant: Kafka, Social Credit, & Critical Theory’:

The change of law into community standards, to go from a basic minimum of legality, to enforced maximal conformity to an ideal; erasure of the distinction between lawfulness and ‘virtue’.

Also in the atrocious neo-fascist work of Deane, to add clarity and veracity to our interpretation of the newspeak, we have added, in brackets, the decoded meaning of the newspeak used in ‘Panoptic blockchain ecosystems: An exploratory case study of the beef supply chain’:

“Within this paper we look at this technology through a different lens and suggest blockchain represents a technologically enabled expression of the modern panopticon, somewhat turned inside out. [It is literal, not inside out]

The term panopticon, first conceptualised by Jeremy Bentham in the 19th century, initially described a physical structure of a jail, which at its heart included a central tower. Surrounding the tower are those who are objects of observation, ‘the watched’, or the prisoners.

The prisoners’ surroundings and circumstances meant that they could not tell if they were being observed in any given moment, and thus were encouraged [terrorized] to behave in the way that the rules dictated. To do anything short of this would potentially result in punishment after the behaviour had occurred.1

This panopticon can be likened to the existing understanding of law and governance. The suggestion that we promote in this paper is that blockchain technology can augment the negative power [disciplinary power] associated with law and governance. Indeed, we show how blockchain enables the creation of voluntary common knowledge associations (voluntary associations) [involuntary block-chain-gangs], in which the participating subjects are empowered to regulate themselves [forced to police each other in a collective punishment system] in a manner which replicates qualities of the panopticon.

To illustrate these ideas, we use observations from the Beefledger project [the project aims to reduce beef availability]. Through these observations we illustrate why blockchain-enabled technology and the resultant formation of voluntary common knowledge associations can be desirable using the metaphor of the panopticon. In the panopticon, the relationship is a one to-many [dictatorial and authoritarian] configuration where the one is a figure of authority (the watcher over the watched).

However, blockchains can enable a new role for the ‘watched’- namely, to also be ‘watchers’. The original ‘watcher’ can therefore take a step back, conserve energy, and let the subjects do their own supervision [involuntary block-chain-gangs]. In this regard, these voluntary associations will benefit [spare from further punishment] not just those who participate within them, but the broader community [community standards created top-down].”

Academia is Producing Moral Failures

Why is there such a desire to create systems suitable for prison, for the free citizens in a society?

Why is the actual failure of the Panopticon prison, built at Millbank, not mentioned? It did not produce meaningful labor from inmates, and the rate of mental illness and suicides skyrocketed. How is this left unaddressed?

This is because progressivism says that past attempts at social engineering only failed because the past didn’t enjoy the contemporary state of the science. Trust the science.

It is here we can see that the academic minions of the technocracy share Bentham’s conflation of technological innovation with good.

In tracing the perfection of this system of the panopticon itself, the new technologies allow the prison to be decentralized and not requiring location.

Movements, thoughts, activities which today are still legal, can at some later date be declared retroactively illegal, and the same can be used as a pre-crime prediction leading towards the algorithmically based arrest for crimes not yet committed.

The prisoners become the prison guards, and taking together Bentham’s panopticon with the 24-7 surveillance state, we have a system which overcomes any potential budgetary obstacle, which Bentham hoped himself to overcome through the tinted glass.

The panopticon of the Smart City is a system set up so that free citizens police, interrogate, and report on each other, and worse, internalize these technocratic rules such that a mass-collective Stockholm syndrome is induced. We see this cancer growing already with the ‘Karen’ phenomenon on Covid19 mandates.

Likewise, the system of academia is a system set up so that students enter with vaguely progressive ideals, and exit ‘Stockholmed’ with a discursive framework connotative of liberation but yet ironically denotative of the top-down order of the technocracy.

Source: Strategic Culture Foundation

 

 

 

"There’s NO case for “vaccinating” children…& the FDA meeting proves it" by Kit Knightly

 

There’s NO case for “vaccinating” children…& the FDA meeting proves it Figures and statements from the recent FDA advisory board meeting totally destroy any argument for jabbing kids.

Kit Knightly
 

Findings from an FDA meeting are being used to raise alarms about the level of risk Covid poses for children, in order to push for the authorisation of the Pfizer vaccine for kids under eleven.

The real story of the statistics is that children face almost no danger from “Covid”, and the experts at the meeting themselves admit the vaccines have unknown side effects, especially in the long term.

*

On October 26th, the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee held a meeting to vote on allowing Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) of Pfizer’s Covid “vaccine” for children aged 5-11.

Getting approved by the VRBPAC is a key step on the way to the FDA issuing an EUA, and with the vote passing the Pfizer vaccine is expected to be approved for use on children in November.

The entire meeting was live-streamed, and you can watch the whole eight hours of it below, if you really feel the need:

For those who would rather not, here are the key take-aways:

  • Seroprevalence studies suggest, as of June 2021, ~42% of 5 to 11-year-olds have been exposed to Covid.
  • Roughly 1.9 million Covid cases have been reported in that age group.
  • 8300 of those cases have resulted in hospitalisation.
  • One third of hospitalisations resulted in an ICU stay.
  • 94 children have died.

These bullet points have been doing the rounds on social media, and in articles, to try and frighten people into believing “Covid” poses a serious risk to their children:

In fact, they show the complete opposite.

Ignores the ridiculous argument about missing school, and ignore the race-baiting nonsense even harder. Focus on the figures.

Five to eleven-year-olds make up roughly 8.7% of the US population, or 32 million people. If the seroprevalence data is correct, that means about 13.4 million children aged 5-11 have been exposed to Covid to the point they’ve developed antibodies.

8300 hospitalisations out of 13.4 million people is only 0.06%. So a child infected with Covid has a 99.86% chance of never needing to go into hospital.

94 deaths out of 13.4 million people gives an overall survival rate of 99.994%. Right in line with CDC predictions from months ago.

As if these numbers aren’t small enough, they all come with important riders that make them even smaller.

Firstly, while the hospitalisation and fatality figures are current, the seroprevalence data is from June of this year. Millions more children have likely been exposed to the virus since June, so logically speaking the survival rate is potentially a significant underestimate.

Secondly, we have no idea what (or how many) pre-existing conditions were present in the children that died. We DO know the vast majority of “Covid deaths” have at least one serious co-morbidity, therefore the survival rate for healthy children is probably even higher than 99.994%.

Finally, there’s the most important rider for this entire situation: We don’t know any of these “covid cases” or “covid deaths” ever had “covid” at all.

The existence of the virus sars-cov-2 as a discrete entity that causes the disease known as Covid is not proven. The tests they use to detect this virus are not fit for purpose and can return huge numbers of false positives. And, since “Covid deaths” are defined only as “death from any cause within 30 days of a positive test”, ALL Covid-related statistics are entirely meaningless.

…but let’s put that aside.

Let us assume, for now, that Covid is very real, that all these children had it, and it tragically resulted in 94 of them dying.

Does a survival rate of at least 99.994% justify an EUA for the Pfizer “vaccine”?

To answer that, let’s compare Covid to the flu, and then see what we really know about these “vaccines”.

Covid vs The Flu

According to these numbers, in the US Covid has killed 94 children aged 5-11 since the beginning of the pandemic.

For comparison’s sake, according to the CDC 2017/2018 flu season resulted in the deaths of at least 188 children of all ages, and they report this is “likely an undercount” and the real number was “closer to 600”. The 2019/20 season was similar, with 199 official flu deaths in children, this is also described as an undercount.

The 2009/10 flu season was much worse, when the Swine flu “pandemic” killed at least 358 children.

And that’s just in flu season, the six months from October to May. Covid has been around for almost two years and is allegedly responsible for 645 deaths in children under 18. That’s a comparable rate to flu, without even taking into account the absurd way “covid deaths” are collated to deliberately inflate the numbers.

Interestingly, in the 20/21 flu season, only 9 pediatric flu hospitalisations were reported, down from the expected “several thousand”. While Covid was out there killing people at about the same rate as the flu, only 1 single child is reported to have died of flu.

All of which is pretty remarkable when you think about.

The vaccines

Having established that Covid has at least a 99.994% survival rate in 5-11 year old children, and that it’s no more dangerous than the flu, is there any argument left for vaccinating children?

Well, yes, there’s the “protect granny” argument.

From the beginning of the pandemic, when it became apparent the allegedly deadly “Covid” plague posed almost no risk whatsoever to children, the argument for vaccinating children wasn’t to protect them, but to prevent them from spreading it to “vulnerable” relatives.

Matt Hancock, the UK’s Health Secretary, even told kids “don’t kill your gran by catching coronavirus and passing it on!”

But do the vaccines mitigate this alleged risk?

No, not according to the latest reports, published in The Lancet and reported by the BBC. The recent study states there is a “continued risk of infection in household contacts despite vaccination”.

So the alleged benefit of vaccinating children turns out to be non-existent. Even if the vaccines were proven safe, injecting them into children has already been shown to be completely pointless…and they are not proven safe.

This is not at all a controversial position, it logically follows that vaccines less than a year old have unknown long-term impacts. Further, Pfizer themselves admit it.

A supply contract between the pharmaceutical giant and the government of Albania, leaked by the independent media, contains a clause that states:

…the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known.

The experts from the VRBPAC panel agree. One of them, Dr Eric Rubin of the Harvard School of Public Health, even said at the meeting (6.52.30):

We’re never going to learn about how safe the vaccine is, until we start giving it.”

…which is not at all a confidence-building thing to hear, if you are a parent.

Conclusion

So, there you have it really. Mainstream experts and sources have been clear:

  • Children are at virtually no risk from the disease.
  • Vaccinated people still transmit the virus.
  • The long term side effects of the vaccine entirely unknown.

In light of all that, the relevant question stops being “Is vaccinating your child worth the risk?”. The answer to that seems to be fairly clearly “no”.

Instead, and rather more importantly, we need to ask: Why would any supposedly independent body ever approve an unnecessary, ineffective and experimental medical treatment for use on children?

 

Source: OffGuardian

Disqus for censorfreezone