The Happiest Place on Earth
November 30, 2021 |
Jean Dunand (Lacquered Panel opal insets) 1926.
“It’s the century of the Jew, the union cutthroat, the fag, and the whore!”
Walt Disney (quoted in Leonard Mosley’s Disney’s World)
“…machinery in itself shortens the hours of labor, but when
employed by capital it lengthens them; in itself it lightens labor, but
when employed by capital it heightens its intensity; in itself it is a
victory of man over the forces of nature but in the hands of capital it
makes man the slave of those forces; in itself it increases the wealth
of the producers, but in the hands of capital it makes them into
paupers.”
Karl Marx (Capital, vol 1)
“White people go around, it seems to me, with a very carefully
suppressed terror of Black people—a tremendous uneasiness…{ } They
don’t know what the Black face hides. They’re sure it’s hiding
something. What it’s hiding is American history.”
James Baldwin (Esquire interview, 1979)
“…the internal politics of the medium { Twitter } is itself a
politics of identity, because it compels us to dedicate more and more
time to performing an identity.”
Richard Seymour (The Twittering Machine)
The resurgence of fascism, globally, has a number of expressions, and
causes. But there feels like a clear connection to the destruction of
sub-cultures, of community, and of culture generally.
“Here, you see, a first consequence of this new order is that a
principle is lacking, one of the fundamental principles of the juridical
order, that is legal certainty. If the State — as jurists have widely
noted — instead of giving a stable normative discipline, intervenes
thanks to the emergency on a certain phenomenon every 15 days, as it
happens, every month, every 15 days, and even declares that there will
be no fixed rule, that the legislation will change continuously, it is
clear that that phenomenon no longer responds to a principle of
legality, because the principle of legality consists precisely in the
fact that the State formulates a stable law and that citizens know what
this law is. Instead we live in a state of uncertainty of law.”
Giorgia Agamben (speech, Nov 2021, Venice Italy, Students Against the Green Pass)
Gabriel Orozco
Without a sub culture, informal meetings, collective creative
projects, and gatherings, people can no longer discuss things. Social
media is the anti-sub culture. It is not even a pretend replacement, but
an antagonist.
“…the operating force of this transformation — perhaps one should
say of this coup d’état because a real coup d’état has taken place.”
Giorgio Agamben (Ibid)
There are voices, like Agamben, or Evo Morales (who calls what is
happening a biological war) saying what many of us have voiced, but in
less categorical terms. But this has been written about extensively
(with comprehensive analysis of the Great Reset and Green New Deal, see
Cory Morningstar, Wrong Kind of Green). What seems increasingly
important however is the psychological condition of western societies,
and how the evolution (or devolution) of advanced capitalism has
affected culture and material living conditions. Looking back at the
early Frankfurt School studies on anti-semitism and the authoritarian
personality, it is interesting to see certain cliches in the thinking of
both workers and management. Some of the questions on the well known
survey (collated into The Authoritarian Personality by Adorno and
others) hint at some of this. Asked do you agree or disagree to
statements such as “today people talk too much and work too little”, or
“the true American way of life is disappearing so fast that force may be
necessary to preserve it”, revealed the outlines of the
sado-masochistic tendency in the followers of authoritarian leaders. It
is not hard to rephrase these questions today and arrive at similar
conclusions. That is one thing. The second issue is, of course, the
significant impact of the internet.
Frieda Toranzo Jaeger
The self loathing is projected outward onto the most vulnerable.
“Aggression and rage toward authority must be denied and tends to
be transformed in self-hatred as well as displaced onto others:
perceived weak, hostile, or “unworthy” members of society.”
Lars Rensman (The Politics of Unreason)
I will return to the psychic architecture of the anal-sadistic and
sado-masochistic personality .. but before that it is worth looking at
how the idea of brand has crept into the collective subjectivity of the
West.
“Photographs of SS uniforms are the units of a particularly
powerful and widespread sexual fantasy. Why the SS? Because the SS was
the ideal incarnation of fascism’s overt assertion of the righteousness
of violence, the right to have total power over others and to treat them
as absolutely inferior. It was in the SS that this assertion seemed
most complete, because they acted it out in a singularly brutal and
efficient manner; and because they dramatized it by linking themselves
to certain aesthetic standards. The SS was designed as an elite military
community that would be not only supremely violent but also supremely
beautiful. . . .”
Susan Sontag (Fascinating Fascism)
What Sontag misses in a not uninteresting monograph is the revulsion
that accompanies the eroticized violence of National Socialism. For
revulsion is actually foregrounded, to a degree.
Enoc Perez (Hotel Fontainbleau, Miami)
“As the design critic Steven Heller argues in his book Iron
Fists: Branding the Twentieth-Century Totalitarian State, Hitler, like
it or not, had an intuitive grasp of the semiotics of power, evidenced
not only in his appropriation of the swastika and rebranding of the
ragtag National Socialist movement, but in his racist stereotyping
(Heller calls it “branding demonization”) of the Ger- man Jews and,
ultimately, in the forced tattooing that marked death- camp inmates for
slaughter—branding in the most horrifically literal sense.”
Mark Dery (I Must Not Think Bad Thoughts)
This is relevant, I think, when one looks at the marketing of the
pandemic. The most obvious first example is the mask. (and already there
is a study indicating significant development problems for children
since masks were introduced in U.S. and U.K. schools). But, like death
camp tattoos, the absorbing of the literal body (Agamben notes the
vaccine is the new sacrament) is both eroticized, but not without a
quality of revulsion. In the case of the pandemic, with the entire
propaganda of institutional medicine as a backdrop, the revulsion is
mitigated to some degree. One is meant to feel some slight revulsion at
medical procedures, that is actually a part of their seduction, their
appeal to power.
“Hitler’s demonic talent for graphic branding reminds us of Walt
Disney, the mediocre cartoonist and self-described benign dictator of
the Happiest Place on Earth, whose iconic mouse ears and branded
signature (not his own; the company designed it, and he learned to forge
it) are as instantly recognizable as the swastika (and, in some
quarters, nearly as feared). We think of the Great Dictator’s childish
delight in Disney cartoons and his unsettling habit of whistling “Who’s
Afraid of the Big, Bad Wolf?” (Hitler nicknamed himself “Wolf”) as he
lurched through the corridors of the ‘Führerbunker’, a cadaverous
apparition sustained by drugs, while the Russian tanks rolled overhead.”
Mark Dery (Ibid)
Gustave Dore
A number of artists have noted the convergence of Hitler and Disney in
cultural terms (Gottfried Helnwein for one). And the fact that Disney
attended American Nazi Party rallies, and visited Mussolini is a part of
this, too. Dery’s chapter on fascist branding is something of a minor
masterpiece and I include just one more quote because its funny, but
also because it touches on the British royal family– those so ardently
driving the de-population agenda of the new climate circus. On the topic
of Prince Harry’s (now Mr. Meghan Markle) boorish nazi costume for a
party…
“While we at the Department of Hitler Studies can understand the
moral recoil from Prince Harry’s yobbish insensitivity, we can’t fathom
the shock expressed in some quarters. Isn’t the little Anus Horribilis’s
act of monumental insensitivity part and parcel of the royals’ highborn
disdain for the simple folk? What’s the point of being in line for the
throne if you’re bound by the moral code that constrains the lesser
ethers? Doesn’t the appalling theme of the party His Royal Highness was
attending—“Colonials and Natives,” which might’ve seemed a waggish
choice if you were sipping gin rickeys after shooting an elephant in
Victorian India—speak volumes about the colonial consciousness of all of
the realm’s bluebloods? As the editors of the London News Review wrote
in their tongue-in-cheek “Defense of the Idiot Prince,”‘Colonials and
Natives’? What the fuck are these people on? What century are they
living in? Colonials and Natives? It beggars belief. Why not
‘Imperialists and Nig Nogs’?” Then, too, it’s common knowledge that a
genteel anti-Semitism has long been part of the aristocratic gene code
in England. { } Jessica (“Decca”) Mitford, an English blueblood, once
referred to “the deep dyed anti-Semitism that pervades all England.” She
knew whereof she spake: Her sister Diana married Sir Oswald Mosely, the
blackshirted Adolf wannabe behind the British Union of Fascists, in a
secret ceremony in Goebbels’s apartment, with Hitler in attendance. To
the end of her days, Diana remained a swastika girl at heart. In The
Sisters: The Saga of the Mitford Family, Mary S. Lovell quotes Diana’s
remarks to a BBC interviewer in 1989. Hitler, she gushed, was
“extraordinarily fascinating and clever.{ } Dina’s charming sister
Unity—whose middle name was Valkyrie and who was conceived in Swastika,
Ontario (I’m not making this up) —was an enthusiastic Nazi, too. She
thought it hilarious when the Nazi governor of Franconia, the virulent
anti-Semite Julius Streicher, forced a group of Jews to mow a
meadow—with their teeth. (Again, our source is Lovell’s The Sisters.)”
Mark Dery (Ibid)
Wanda Pimentel
And yet, the most popular Netflix series last year was
The Crown,
the fatuous revisionist fantasy life of the current Queen. Dery has
another short chapter on Hitler and Madison Avenue. This is complex, but
the ruling classes of all nations share the same interests and
sympathies, and that National Socialism should eventually be
rehabilitated is not difficult to understand. As Dery notes, Hitler
loved media. He put a lot of effort into his image, into branding his
Party. But as Joachim Fest writes (from his book
Hitler)…
“A
curious note of inferiority, a sense of stuntedness always overlay the
phenomenon of Hitler, and not even the many triumphs could dispel this.
All his personal traits did not add up to a real person. The reports and
recollections we have from members of his entourage do not make him
tangibly vivid as a man; he moves with masklike impersonality through a
setting.” But the bourgeois clerk may be drawn to exactly this
quality. The sense of personal alienation bred by social media, by
screens in general, (and here Jonathan Beller is relevant again) the
photographic image are all constituative in the manufacturing of white
supremacism itself. Or the current incarnation of it. The assembled
parts of fascist aesthetics are being repurposed for 21st century use in
myriad ways.
The U.S. orchestrated a coup in Ukraine that put a Nazi party in
power. I mean there are photos of John McCain and Biden on stage at a
rally with leaders of this party. This is the real politik of the
privileged white class in America (never mind the party put in power in
the region, as a break off from Ukraine, named a street for Stepan
Bandera, Nazi supporter, and decorated the local mall at Christmas with a
huge swastika). But then, again, this is the point. Fascist resurgence
has broken to the surface during the pandemic lockdowns. Certainly
eastern Europe had large reservoirs of fascist sentiment slumbering
since WW2. Remember Project Paperclip?
“As Allied forces crossed the English Channel during the D-Day
invasion of June 1944, some 10,000 intelligence officers known as
T-Forces were right behind the advance battalions. Their mission: seize
munitions experts, technicians, German scientists and their research
materials, along with French scientists who had collaborated with the
Nazis. Soon a substantial number of such scientists had been picked up
and placed in an internment camp known as the Dustbin. { } Operation
Overcast was certainly under way by July 1945, approved by the Joint
Chiefs of Staff to bring into the US 350 German scientists, including
Werner Von Braun and his V2 rocket team, chemical weapons designers, and
artillery and submarine engineers. There had been some theoretical ban
on Nazis being imported, but this was as empty as FDR’s edict. The
Overcast shipment included such notorious Nazis and SS officers as Von
Braun, Dr. Herbert Axster, Dr. Arthur Rudolph and Georg Richkey. Von
Braun’s team had used slave labor from the Dora concentration camp and
had worked prisoners to death in the Mittelwerk complex: more than
20,000 had died from exhaustion and starvation. The supervising
slavemaster was Richkey. In retaliation against sabotage in the missile
plant – prisoners would urinate on electrical equipment, causing
spectacular malfunctions – Richkey would hang them twelve at a time from
factory cranes, with wooden sticks shoved into their mouths to muffle
their cries. In the Dora camp itself he regarded children as useless
mouths and instructed the SS guards to club them to death, which they
did.”
Alexander Cockburn (Operation Paperclip: Nazis Head West, Counterpunch 2017)
Disney made enthusiastic use of Von Braun when designing ‘tomorrow
land’. If FDR had reservations about the wholesale import of high
ranking Nazi engineers and scientists, Truman had none. (shock, that).
John Madu
Alexander Cockburn (
Ibid)
The department of defense and the Pentagon went to great lengths
after the war and on into the 50s to shelter the nazi criminals working
for them. And the response when questioned about the employment of war
criminals was that its better we have them then Stalin. This was the
real engine driving nearly everything — fear and hatred of communism.
And if that meant helping men who tortured Jewish women and children,
well, you must break eggs to make that omelette.
Worth noting that former Nazis worked with every branch of the U.S.
military, conducted secret experiments (such as giving radioactive
oatmeal to kids, or the various LSD experiments on prisoners, the poor,
and often the psychologically impaired, as well as, across the board, on
blacks) and “Many of the prisoners in the experiments in the Oregon
and Washington state prisons were given vasectomies or were surgically
castrated. The doctor who performed the sterilization operations told
the prisoners the sterilizations were necessary to “keep from
contaminating the general population with radiation-induced mutants.”
Over fifty thousand children were exposed to cancer causing radiation
from 1947 to 1963. And it may never be known just how many casualties
there were since Richard Helms ordered the destruction of all CIA
records on experimentation on humans. Von Braun became something of a
celebrity, and wrote an auto biography titled “I Aim at the Stars” (for which I remember Mort Sahl suggesting a subtitle…’ but sometimes I hit London’).
And yet, and yet, during this pandemic the public is constantly told to ‘trust the science’.
Joanna Zastrozna, photography.
This quality of disgust, or revulsion, was according to Freud a
reaction formation , a defense mechanism to reject the desired object.
And revulsion is always associated with animal/human boundaries. It
began with bad food, spoiled food. Its both taste and smell.
“Features of the anal character also live on in several
inter-related traits that are mainstays of contemporary personality
psychology, including perfectionism, disgust-proneness, authoritarianism
and conscientiousness. The anal character stubbornly endures.”
Nick Haslam (Toilet Psychology, The British Psychological Society, 2012)
Revulsion is also tied into a shrinking of experience — the banality
of existence and repetition. And fetishizing of excretion is linked to
shame and disgust.
“Shame reflects a belief that the self is soiled or spoiled,
whereas disgust reflects a perception that something outside the self is
contaminating, either literally, as with faeces and rotten food, or
metaphorically, as with rotten conduct. Moral disgust is triggered by
violations of rules of purity and sacredness, and the emotion can
intensify moral condemnation even when it is unrelated to what is being
condemned. { } From excretion’s link to moral judgement it is a small
step to its association with social attitudes. There is strong evidence
that disgust-proneness is related to prejudice.”
Nick Haslam (Ibid)
Disney and Von Braun.
Giorgia Agamben (
Infancy and History)
I am trying to tie together a couple of historical threads, or
trajectories, with the state of contemporary fascism. The majority of
the human race clearly has seen through the propaganda coming from the
WHO, WEF, the various western governments, but many, enough I fear, have
not. And, most troubling, even among the clear headed and skeptical,
one finds the residue of that propaganda, even if the content has
changed.
Walter Benjamin has a famous paragraph on the state of the return
soldiers of WW1. He marks this as the start of the loss of experience,
the start of a new stage in the class struggle.
“men returned … grown silent- not richer, but poorer in
communicable experience … What ten years later was poured out in the
flood of war books was anything but experience that goes from mouth to
mouth. And there was nothing remarkable about that. For never has
experience been contradicted more thoroughly than strategic experience
by tactical warfare, economic experience by inflation, bodily experience
by mechanical warfare, moral experience by those in power. “
Walter Benjamin (The Storyteller)
Diana Watson
I would not argue this. But I think that the contamination of
consciousness began much earlier. That may be a topic for another post.
Here, though, I think the onset of capitalism, however one wants to date
it, makes the clearest marker. For the other thread in this is *white
supremacism*. And so the 350 years of the modern slave trade has to be
included. And somewhere in this arose the neurotic modern individual.
And Nick Haslam refers to it as the ‘return of the anal character’.
The Obsessive Compulsive (or OCPD) is the latest version of the anal
character. Some suggest as many as 8% of the population of the U.S. and
UK suffer from OCPD. And while its listed as a maladaptive mechanism,
the OCPD personality tends to do well at work and badly in intimate
relationships. One might wonder if there isn’t a kind of
Political/capitalistic Darwinism at work. Rigid, conscientious, and
detail oriented. Sounds perfect for Apple or Microsoft. In fact, it
sounds like Bill Gates and Larry Page.
The anal character, OCPD, is often extraordinarily intolerant. The
content of his intolerance is of no great importance to him or her, only
that he or she is able to fit his or her subjective picture of
perfection into his or her daily interactions. The OCPD is, in a sense,
existentially intolerant.
Freud saw the anal character as having an exaggerated disgust
response. There is a kind of triad that needs unpacking here; disgust,
shame, and OCPD.
“There appear to be three underlying facets of disgust
sensitivity: ‘core disgust’, which relates to rejection of offensive
stimuli; ‘animal reminders’,which make us aware of our animal nature and
origins; and ‘contamination’, which relates to the dread of catching a
disease or other feared attribute from others.”
Nick Haslam (Psychology in the Bathroom)
William Holman (the scapegoat) 1856.
The disgust factor is something, however varied a particular individual
may be in his or her triggers, hinges on sexual phobia. (see Klaus
Theweleit,
Male Fantasies). And usually disgust is linked to
moistness, and a fear of the interior of unknown places (women often).
There is also a pronounced homophobia in the anal character, and a
tendency toward authoritarianism (Adorno, of course, noted this in the
40s). The anti-gay bias is present in both men and women who are
diagnosed with OCPD. Now what is important here, are not so much the
many other characteristics (attention to detail, hoarding, and
collecting etc) but the moral dimension of disgust (and shame). (note
that its likely time to re-read Wilhelm Reich).
But the resurgence of fascism is placed within the disenchantment of
the modern world. Those who have embraced the pandemic narrative and
follow, to the letter, all the restrictions, are those who have
internalized some aspect of the anal character. The white bourgeoisie,
in general, are those most comfortable. Their relative affluence is a
huge factor, but it goes beyond that. The submission to the Great Reset
is aligned with the acceptance of the pandemic restrictions.
“But why has the mainstream Left ended up supporting practically
all Covid measures? How did such a simplistic view of the relationship
between health and the economy emerge, one which makes a mockery of
decades of (Left-leaning) social science research showing just how
closely wealth and health outcomes are connected? Why did the Left
ignore the massive increase in inequalities, the attack on the poor, on
poor countries, on women and children, the cruel treatment of the
elderly, and the huge increase in wealth for the richest individuals and
corporations resulting from these policies?”
Toby Green & Thomas Fazi (The Left’s Covid Failure)
Rabarama
This is a basic question just now. One that has been discussed on the
Aesthetic Resistance podcasts. And Green and Fazi give good answers, but I think there is more.
Their entire paper is here:
https://unherd.com/2021/11/the-lefts-covid-failure/
And I think a part of that ‘more’ in the answer has to do with the
drastic decline in education, the deleterious affects of smart phones
and screen habituation. And the Disneyfication of aesthetics, the
strange cultic attachment to a fictive idea of science, and a growing
alienation from experience — that the ‘screen age’ has produced a
culture , in the white bourgeoisie anyway, perilously close to OCPD.
“If the ego is unable to unfold as an independent, autonomous
agency, it remains emotionally and spiritually stunted.This is the
“small ego,” which is bound, morally and at the level of the drive
structure, to unconscious and “external” agencies. { } The “small ego”
of such a nonintegrated personality, profoundly incapable of any action
that transcends the limits of a narrowly conceived self-interest or
interest of the subject’s own group, mirrors according to Adorno the
goal-oriented rationality of capitalism, which in the advanced phase of
its diffusion recognizes nothing beyond the exploitation of objects for
profit.”
Lars Rensmann (Ibid)
There is one more side here worth attention. I quote Rensmann again…
“If the ego is too weak to develop the capacity to integrate
seemingly overwhelming instinctual desires and the superego, and thus
the individual’s conscience is externalized, that is, not integrated
into the self, and hardly brought in tune with the requirements of
reality, internal conflicts cannot be mastered. This may lead to
anxiety- filled, tormented reactions. The superego appears as
particularly rigid in the attempt to bring the internal chaos and
aggressions in sync. The result, according to Adorno, is a destructive
congestion of the drives, severe repres- sion of the subject’s
instinctual needs, which then manifest in the authoritarian individual’s
furtive fascination with the sexual.”
Pedro Meyer, photography.
The proliferation of porn on the internet is an expression of this, but I
think the direction and content of the most popular porn sites has also
shifted. But Adorno noted that the authoritarian subject has a stunted
emotional life, and a growing incapacity to distinguish between reality
and fantasy. Such a condition results in acute anxiety, and in a
dependency on the voices of authority. In western societies, today, the
figure of authority is experienced via institutional voices (experts).
Submission to a very historically determined idea of *science* (and
research). There is, following Freud, a failed resolution of the Oedipus
complex, regression to infantile drives and aims, to an archaic form of
the self. The ego simply never develops properly. It is a return,
really, to anal-sadistic solutions of development — Oedipal or not.
And this accounts for the moral dimension today of the in-group, the
believers in mainstream definitions of science who then feel exaggerated
moral outrage at those not conforming to the institutional figures of
power. This is the real change that has occurred since the second World
War. Today the WHO and the WEF and those vetted voices of science to
which one must submit. Hitler has become a global health institution.
And there is a strange embrace of the very wealthy, the unelected ruling
priests of Capital, Gates and Page and Musk and their ventriloquist
dummies such as Fauci or Tedros. And it is not hard to observe leaders
such as the visibly demented Jacinda Ardern of New Zealand who gleefully
chatters away to her citizenry as if talking to a kindergarten class.
She can barely contain her pleasure at invoking restrictions and
punishments. The world stage resembles Sesame Street.
“The authoritarian individual is thus always an “adjusted”
individual, a conformist. Since he has neither worked through the
renunciation of his instinctual desires nor formed an autonomous
subjectivity vis-à-vis authoritarian power, he is beaten and powerless
and conforms to whatever system is in power, particularly if it
represents hardness, order, and physical force. He takes on the coldness
and inflexibility with which he was treated, while the deadened or
damagingly constrained libidinal needs manifest themselves in distorted
ways: in longing for the empty “warmth” of authoritarian community and
the soldierly romanticism of the bivouac, and in the bond with a leader.
Accordingly, it is argued, the most thoroughly adjusted individuals,
who conform most to a certain “middle-class culture,” also tend to
harbor the most prejudices.”
Lars Rensmann (Ibid)
Edward Burne Jones
What is so startling today is that artists and culture workers are among
the most adjusted and conformist. The gradual eradication of sub
culture and an avant-garde has left the creative impulse in a kind of
limbo. Social media has bred addictions to rage and ridicule, and little
more, really. A study Nick Haslam notes was done on graffiti in public
restrooms…
“If graffiti-writing simply represented a benign flowering of
creativity then anti-authoritarians would tend to do more of it,but the
opposite pattern was observed.Frequent writers scored higher on a survey
assessing conformity, submission to traditional authority and
punitiveness towards people who violate social norms. In this study much
of the graffiti that were observed were anti-gay and hostile to members
of other groups, a kind of latrinalia for which authoritarians might
have special gifts.”
Nick Haslam (Psychology in the Bathroom)
The anal character then, linked inextricably with authoritarian tendencies, is going to take up a lot of space on social media .
“Just as the authoritarian subject needs to contain, punish,
project, or deaden the chaotic drive energies that build up in his own
psyche, countering them with strict adherence to hierarchical order, so,
too, does he aspire to rebuild the external world of the living as a
dead world, one that would function according to his rigid principles of
order.”
Lars Rensmann (Ibid)
The dead world of the pandemic lockdowns, the empty streets, the
boarded up restaurants and clubs, this is exactly what the authoritarian
subject desires. And even with the blatant privilege granted to the
wealthy and celebrities, whose private jets never stop flying, and whose
parties are openly flaunting all social distancing rules and mask
edicts, the authoritarian follower, the anal character of today, seems
not to notice.
Doug Aitken
Theodor Adorno, et al (
The Authoritarian Personality)
When Marx wrote (Grundrisse)…“Hunger is hunger, but the hunger
gratified by cooked meat eaten with a knife and fork is a different
hunger from that which bolts down raw meat with the aid of hand, nail
and tooth. Production thus produces not only the object but also the
manner of consumption, not only objectively but subjectively.”
He was describing something inescapable about societal progress. And
one can’t quite deny this, but it is also an almost metaphor for what
digitalization has done to contemporary human experience. The so called
attention economy produces a kind of attention, which it mines, and
collects — but the experience of this attention is not the attention of
sitting and watching Paul Scofield perform Lear. This sort of thing is
not new, but it has become intensified and pervasive today. In the West
nearly everyone conducts life on their smart phone. So life is
trivialized. And there is, as Agamben notes, something untranslatable
about it. Others have said much the same thing, and Agamben, as a slight
digression, is a highly problematic thinker. Firstly, he’s not a
Marxist, and I have no idea the degree of hostility he holds for Marx.
And his politics (at least before the Venice speech quote above) was
pretty reactionary. Not as bad as Badiou or Zizek, but bad enough. And
here it is worth observing that academia, in nearly all branches but
certainly philosophy, has a lack of radical dissenters. Its the
professionalization of thinking. It is much like theatre where people
want that MFA in playwrighting or directing the better to later teach.
Or they write work following the academic model, regardless of whether
they lose their voice in the process or not. Where does one find
graduate students attacking the near fascism of a Badiou for example? I
was reading a chapter by Antonio Vadolas, who has written some good
stuff on psychoanalysis and culture, but he firstly never questioned the
conflation of fascism and communism, nor the comparison of Hitler and
Stalin, and then even brought up Milosevic in the same breath as Saddam
Hussein. This is stuff you should know by grad school. How can anyone
still be confused about the break up of Yugoslavia? Honestly, how is
that even possible? It speaks to a wilful ignorance. And as an anecdotal
aside, the most popular author I find in countless PhD theses on
history and politics is Hannah Arendt. And Arendt is mostly a pretty
terrible writer and one with an agenda at that (clean up the Nazi image
the better to reinstate Heidegger. That was the gig. Full stop.) End of
digression.
“They were enthusiastic technicians with the mission according to Goebbels of
saving Germany. “
Walter Jessel, second Lt. June 1945 (quoted in Our Germans, Brian Crim)
Albrecht Altdorfer (Satyr with bagpipe, 1530)
Throughout the pandemic and certainly forefronted in the propaganda of
the ‘Great Reset’, is the idea of saving — rescuing or protecting. Save
the planet, save your grandmother, save the future. Protect the planet,
protect nature, protect grandma. There is a quality of messianism
running through the marketing, and I sometimes wonder if its even
intentional. For the climate marketing, it’s clear they have pushed
something akin to an evangelical tone, in a mash up with New Age
bromides and cliches. But even the pandemic has taken on a tone I last
heard on charismatic christian preachers.
Now, I was struck how often when you read descriptions of the Nazis
you hear the word technician. The emphasis is always on precision and a
near Euclidean code of duty. Agamben’s observation that the pandemic is
now a religion certainly seems correct. And the authoritarian subjects
of the affluent white bourgeoisie, those of the new OCPD variant of
anal-sadism, are eager to join in this new crusade, a planetary exercise
in white saviourism. And yet, millions of people around the world are
protesting. My sense is these are mostly working class people, those hit
hardest by this new religion. I think they fear for their children
(shit, I fear for my children). And then Africa, a continent barley
vaccinated at all, whose population has near unanimously rejected the
entire narrative.
So the question is really in what way the engagement with screens,
with social media, and with electronic media has contributed to the
weakening of an already weak ego, a ‘small ego’, and in turn this weak
ego has intensified this divorce from our bodies, and a reliance on an
ever stricter super-ego. Or, perhaps more, that this screen habituation
has reinforced a societal encouragement to think instrumentally, to
mimic those symptoms found in OCDP, and perhaps that mimic of symptom
becomes actual symptom. For what is illness, exactly, in a society so
aggressively irrational and manipulative. What one has seen over twenty
years is the the manufacturing of the anal character, and the
simultaneous evisceration of any counter culture.
Rudolf Schlichter (1924)
The absence today of radical art is something I have written about a
great deal on this blog. One could find other descriptions, serious art,
or work that resists commodification in some way, an art whose truth
component lives on regardless if it is hanging in the lobby of Chase
Manhattan Bank. But along with this retreat from ambitious work, work of
integrity, is the loss of culture over all. There are few places to
gather informally and talk. There is little cross pollination except at
controlled locations like University arts departments. And the
entertainment industry openly ridicules the idea of collective projects
of creativity. It ridicules artists generally, much as it does
intellectuals. The exceptions reveal the truth of this. The Dan Brown
franchises for example, with nerdy know it alls who are in service of
the state. The signifier for genius today is ‘computer genius. Nobody is
a genius of calligraphy or poetry.
The pandemic has been fed credibility by countless doctors and
scientists. I want to make clear that science is as prone to sell-out as
any other field, and perhaps more, actually.
“Nazi science enabled the worst atrocities committed by the Third
Reich. Scientists and engineers, even those with few party affiliations
or minimal ideological commitment, willingly lent their talents to the
regime in exchange for professional advancement and the opportunity to
continue their research with limitless funding or institutional support.
{ } . Consequently, scientists and engineers, specifically the V-2
specialists and others involved in aeronautics, participated in several
areas of criminality. First, slave labor built the panoply of wonder
weapons for the Third Reich. The SS reacted to and interacted with the
experts when supplying the bodies needed. Second, several scientists
acquired through Paperclip had some involvement in the notorious medical
experiments conducted on concentration camp victims. { } The SS
expanded a facility in a mountain called Kohnstein, near Nordhausen, in
the province of Thuringia. The SS and Albert Speer’s Ministry of
Armaments together created the Mittelwerk Company, comprising several SS
officials to oversee construction and manage the project. After first
leveraging labor from neighboring Buchenwald to build the underground
complex and then work on the assembly line, the SS established
Mittelbau-Dora in summer 1944 as a separate camp serviced by a network
of forty smaller camps. The Dora camppredated the evacuation of
Peenemünde, supplying twenty thousand prisoners for the production of
Junkers aircraft and the Vergeltungswaffe 1 (retribution weapon), or
V-1, “flying bomb” produced by the Luftwaffe. The Mittelbau complex
provided approximately sixty thousand laborers for the V-2 and V-1 from
August 1943 to April 1945. In that time twenty thousand died from
starvation, sickness, injuries, mistreatment, and executions. Andrè
Sellier, an inmate at Dora and a historian of the camp, described being
“caught in a power struggle between the SS and the civil and military
technocrats: in other words, between Arms Minister Albert Speer and his
engineers, Wehrmacht military specialists, and the team of rocket
specialists behind von Braun.” The systematic use of concentration camp
labor, to which none of the interested parties objected, aided the SS in
its ambition to control the Reich’s war industry. According to recently
discovered documents, the SS went so far as to test the V-2 on German
villages in Pomerania and blame the destruction on Allied bombers. Such
callous depravity on the part of the SS only minimized the
Paperclippers’ “lesser crimes” of consent or indifference during the
Paperclip deliberations.”
Brian Crim (Our Germans)
Ode Bertrand
More people died building the V2 rocket program than were killed by the
rocket. By the end of the war the German war machine was driven by
overwrought and near hysterical zealots, at the top of which fetid
pyramid was Hitler himself. The wholesale and often casual murder of
slave labour, was commonplace at all the major German munitions and
building plants. The scientists and engineers interacted with the slave
labor, they were there for random hangings, and for the constant
beatings. And they designed chemical and gas weapons, and they took part
in medical experiments on prisoners (Jews mostly but certainly at this
point many resistance fighters, Roma, and other undesirables). The
scientists knew this was coming years before. All of them could have
left. They did not. The best career opportunities were in the Reich.
Adorno noted that anti semitism increased after the end of WW2, not lessened. As Zvi Rex observed, “The Germans will never forgive the Jews for Auschwitz.” So Americans could not tolerate Jews for creating these problems for those good clean cut handsome scientists like Von Braun.
“American Jews were inexplicably blamed for controversy
surrounding the more notorious Paperclippers. Shortly after the German
epidemiologist Walter Schreiber joined the staff at the Air Force School
of Medicine in 1951,several press outlets reported his links to medical
experimentation during the Third Reich, prompting the air force, CIA,
and JIOA to facilitate his emigration to Argentina.101 Allen Dulles
personally handled the matter, agreeing that the United States could
benefit from Schreiber’s knowledge if he served a friendly regime like
Argentina’s. Unfortunately for the air force, a group of American
doctors released damning military documents and protested Schreiber’s
continued employment all the way to the White House. One embarrassing
memo quoted an air force official who declared Schreiber “too hotfor me”
and blamed “an organized medical movement against [Schreiber],
emanating from Boston, by medical men of Jewish ancestry, I would
suspect.” Thirty-five years later, Arthur Rudolph’s defenders also
implied that “his critics were bitter Jews who harbored anti-German
sentiment.”
Brian Crim (Ibid)
The perculiar convergence of digitalization, the new economics of the
Reset, and the influence, now, from the billionaires of Silicon Valley,
along with the growing isolation and alienation of the American public,
with the historical force of racism and anti semitism is finding
expression in the messianic religion of Covid. The dead world of the
pandemic, the hyper isolation and intentional neglect of the old is
really what was behind The Happiest Place on Earth, just nobody cared to
look. The historical influence of Disney and both his cartoons (the
features which anticipated crane tracking shots and cinemascope) and his
sensibility and amusement parks was always one aligned with fascism.
One felt that even as a child. Disneyland was fun, for a while, until it
wasn’t. The obvious depravity of those Nazi scientists was ignored the
better to fight the threat of communism. Fascism was fine, in fact
America was always headed toward fascism anyway, but that darn Soviet
Union and Commie China posed the real threat. Disney was the face of
America. The old Donald Duck cartoons were (as Ariel Dorfman wrote about
in How to Read Donald Duck ) parables of monopoly capitalism.
And of colonialism. (Adventureland could as well have been named
Colonialism Land, and Frontierland been called Manifest Destiny land,
and Tomorrowland, well, it was sort of the world imagined by Nazi
scientists). The Reich lived on, because finally (with some notable
exceptions) the US ruling class liked Hitler (oh ok, he went a bit too
far, but…hey…) Disney also invited and paid for a visit from Nazi
filmmaker Leni Reifenstahl. And converging here too is Pop Art and the
ascension of irony. Nazi regalia as de rigour for S&M fantasies is
also a statement of irony. At some point children seated at school desks
surrounded by a plastic cage will be seen much the same way.
Anselm Kiefer , photography.
Robert Bly died this week, age 94. It will take me some time before I
can write about Bly, because I have not yet processed a world without
him. RIP Robert. (and I hate this new trend to say Rest in Power. When I
die, I don’t want power, I want peace.)
Source: John Steppling
